|
Reader
upset that a dog was euthanized
Miles,
a dog at the Clinton Humane Society was put down July 11 with
a lethal injection. His death would not occasion a letter to
the editor if Miles were not a very special dog. Months ago
several of us associated with the shelter raised thousands of
dollars in the community to provide Miles with necessary but
expensive surgery. During the fundraising however, a few CHS
board members complained that the money raised for Miles was
"misspent" since it was only ticketed for one dog.
What about all the other dogs at the shelter, they asked.
The
answer we provided was that the money would not have been raised
at all if it weren't for Miles, so it could hardly have been
misspent. Moreover, in our two fundraisers for him, Miles his
picture in many stories had taken on a kind of symbolic value;
he stood for all the animals at the shelter when he received
his surgery, we argued, it would provide a "feel-good story"
for a community ravaged by foreclosures and rising unemployment.
Finally,
the money raised had not yet even been spent because the veterinarian
recommended delay until the dog was stronger.
The
skeptical board members seemed mollified by our arguments and
Miles was kept at the shelter awaiting his surgery. But during
this time and ugly and unrelated fight broke out amongst a few
board members. As a result, this spring I was asked to leave
the board; my wife Pat who had volunteered countless hours at
the shelter over many years was told she was no longer welcome
there; and we have heard the shelter administrator is no longer
there. (Coincidentally, all three of us had been outspoken advocates
for Miles, and Pat had scoured the community raising money for
him).
On
July 11, with the board authorization and approval, Miles was
put down with lethal injection. He never received his surgery.
None
of us involved in the fundraising and who made very large contributions
of our own, were notified either before the dog was put down
or afterwards. None of us, that is was given an opportunity
to adopt the dog and provide the surgery he needed at our own
expense. Perhaps most importantly because it affects the trust
we have in our shelter, the good-faith gesture of a community
that raised thousands of dollars in a time of severe recession
has been compromised if not betrayed.
Roger
Fraser
Clinton
|